Thoughts on Audrey Watters’ “Thoughts on Annotation” fascinating stuff. There was quite a lot of grumpiness about the root of this. This is a lot more measured and interesting.
I played around with this occasionally, mashing up the contents of my camera roll. The app crashed occasionally and the creations were only really visible inside the app. Still it was fun, and interesting to see what others made with it.
Yesterday I got a email, the betas was over and new version was out and it had changed tack. Universe was now a tool to build websites. I downloaded it and made a page within about 3 minutes: john.onuniverse.com.
Hosting on an onuniverse.com subdomain is free, but you can pay for a domain.
When I tried the original betas version it felt as if the lack of publishing to the web was the main problem. This is now fixed. The new version lacks many of the interactive features of the beta, but it share the same easy to use interface. On creating or editing a page you have a 3 by 5 grid. Clicking on a square on the grid or dragging over several (so you can have a larger block) allows you to edit that square. You choose the type of content and then edit. Once you are finished a click or two and the site is published.
Publishing to the web from your phone is nothing new, I blogs from my iPhone, have edited sites with text editors and there are lots of ways to publish. Universe stands out as one of the easiest ways to put up a neat page quickly while on the go.
Adding further pages to your site is at the moment not as elegant as it could be, they don’t share the same sub-domain. There is no support for animated gifs (converted to jpgs), videos can only be 3 seconds long and loop in a gif like manner. I’d love to see support from some of the ways that the ‘old’ universe animated sections of the grid and sound could be played. I guess that might come. But overall this is a really nice way to make a website very quickly.
If you want a quick individual about me page for an event or to knock up a page for your days photos on the bus home, this is the app for you. I wonder too if it could be used in education. From a data protection pov I am not sure where it would stand, but it could be fun for pupils to build wee sites.
Featured image: combine screenshots of the app.
- Introducing Universe 1.0 — Build the Web
- Howard Rheingold is involved in this somehow. That alone should make it of interest. and Mamie Rheingold too.
Over the years I’ve used dropbox as a quick way to publish webpages. many of which I’ve linked to from post here.
I’ve got plenty of other places to post to the web but for some things and some wee projects it has been very convenient to drop html files into my dropbox’s public folder they are published.
Dropbox Basic (free) users: Beginning October 3, 2016, you can no longer use shared links to render HTML content in a web browser. If you created a website that directly displays HTML content from your Dropbox, it will no longer render in the browser. The HTML content itself will still remain in your Dropbox and can be shared.
Google Drive did something similar at the end of August this year.
I believe that both services removed this feature because of abuse. A great pity. It will have broken quite a few links I’ve posted.
The most frequent use I made of this was a simple mashup of gpx files, google maps and flickr photo sets. It was on adding to this today I notice the breakage.
I suppose I could try one of the services that publish your files in dropbox else where or set up some sort of script to upload things but any alternatives, ftp, surge, github etc that I’ve tried lack the simplicity.
I know we are in the days of lots of free space, but it is worth remembering when blogging (or making webpages) shrinking images is worth doing for your visitors.
I don’t always do it, but today as I updates a Glow Blogs Help page, I saved nearly half the space by using, ImageOptim — better Save for Web.
There are other tools, but this one is free & open source, works on a Mac, but lists and links to windows & linux tools.
I’m not on holiday at the moment but taking the odd day off over the summer. Yesterday was one. I found a good set of amusing links, here are a few.
The New Devil’s Dictionary From The Verge updates Ambrose Bierce’s The Devil’s Dictionary.
blogger (n.): An invasive species with no natural predators.
GIF (n.): Many prefer to pronounce this word “GIF,” instead of the more controversial-sounding “GIF.”
music (n.): An art form whose medium is copyright law.
And so on.
This reminded me to google for an english translation of Flaubert’s Dictionary of Received Ideas, hoping as usual for a creative commons version that could be played with. As usual I didn’t find that but got In Place of Thought – The New Yorker by Teju Cole which adapts the idea for modern times:
COFFEE. Declare that it is intolerable at Starbucks. Buy it at Starbucks. EVOLUTION. Only a theory. FASCISM. Always preceded by “creeping.” FEMINISTS. Wonderful, in theory. FISH. A vegetable.
Ouch, that last one stung!
Bonus Twitter mashup
Checking Teju Cole (@tejucole) on Twitter as his ideas started as tweets, I found:
- He seems to have abandoned twitter and
- The Time of the Game, a synchronized global view of the World Cup final. Just the sort of thing I like on the web, except for the football element.
Here are a great series of articles that I came across this morning. I’d recommend everyone interested in the Internet and education to read them.
For someone who reads a lot online I do not dip into TES often. So I was excited to find:
Jim Knight: ‘Let’s give all students their own domain name – and watch the digital learning that follows’ today.
Ironically I got it via Jim Groom’s post:
Domains and the Cost of Innovation. I do read Jim’s blog religiously.
Jim Knight’s article is based on another wonderful post by Audrey Watters> Audrey writes about the work of Jim Groom and others at the University of Mary Washington: The Web We Need to Give Students.
I’ve been muttering and mumbling about this idea for a good while now, based on reading about the UMW project and taking part in DS106. I really hope that the TES article gives the idea some legs and it can get some traction in the UK and more importantly, to me, in Scotland.
Before I started working on the Glow team, I included it in a post, Glow should be at the trailing edge?. I don’t think the idea has ever been given serious consideration at the right level. It certainly goes is a slightly different direction than Glow is going but it is still worth considering.
So do be a favor, see how we can change the distribution of sand grains, use “Futzopublicus” online now.
Nice lesson from Alan Levine, about the web and how it works, of a URL being a living thing.
Just joining in to see how this ripples, but it would be an interesting lesson with a class:
- Who can find a word that is not searchable?
- How fast can we make it searchable?
Update 10 minutes after posting:
Update August 7, 2015, I managed to delete my example sway by accident on my phone! While swiping to delete another sway the interface hung, I swiped twice and lost both! There is no undelete/undo! Another reason for just blogging I guess.
After testing Slate a while back I though I’d try out Microsoft Sway. I downloaded the app to my phone on the bus and made this while traveling home on bus and train.
Sway feels much like Adobe Slate, I used the same words and pictures to test Slate on my iPad a few posts ago: Chalking my First Slate.
Both Apps produce stylish, responsive webpages with nice fonts, full width images and slick galleries created from blocks of content.
Both host everything for you at no cost. Neither lets you download the work locally.
I am ‘reviewing’ them for a position of using them once. Given Sway is beta and I only used the iPhone app I take everything here with a pinch of salt.
While Slate was iPad only ,the iOS version of Sway is for the iPhone. Sway in the browser seems to be more of a web producer fitting in with your MS office account apps.
I’ve also installed Sway on an iPad and it just scales the interface to fit the screen, it seems to work just as well there as on the phone.
I was surprised to find how pleasant Sway was to use on a phone. The interface made it easy to add the content blocks.
The browser version of Sway allows video and access to photos from Flickr, OneDrive, Youtube and more. Slate give access to Lightroom, Creative Cloud and DropBox. The Sway iPhone app only gives access to your camera roll at the moment.
Sway is in preview and the iPhone app indicates that there are more content block (called cards) in the works. Currently you can add Headers (image and text), photos text and More. The more turns out to be ‘cards’ currently groups and stacks of images, more are coming:
Sway on Glow?
When I posted my sway on twitter, I got a reply from someone from Microsoft. I had the chance to ask if Sway would be usable with a edu O365 account:
— chris pratley (@chrispr) April 16, 2015
Sway would make a nice presentation tool for use in Glow.
I’ve got a few negative feelings about all of these services.
Firstly the lack of control of the data you publish to them. I’ve watched a few web services disappear. I generally like to at least have an export option. I’d love one of these tools to give you the opportunity to publish to your own space or download copies. That said it seems unlikely any of these companies are going out of business soon.
I also wonder if all of these highly polished presentation tools take away some creativity. Making anything with technology gives a range of choices about how near the metal you get with your tools. If we were trying to teach learners about presentation there are limitations.
Sway’s built-in design engine takes the hassle out of formatting your various pieces of content by integrating them into a cohesive layout. From there, you can easily adjust the design to create a look and feel that reflects your unique style.
Some might think that the hassle is part of the fun or learning?
I am quite likely wrong about this. I’ve be saying it for a while. I though the same about iMovie trailers, too easy to learn with. But I’ve seen some nice examples of learning using iMovie trailers.
There is also this problem…
Is the Medium the Message?
Both Sway and Slate remind me of medium, I’ve put the same text and images on medium as a comparison.
I also created a home knitted version The Devils Pulpit. This is somewhat less polished, but fun to do.
All three applications are easy to pick up an use. They do not allow much customisation of the layout. Sway having more choices medium the least.
Sway and Slate both offer embed codes, Slate’s is limited to a clickable splash screen that takes you to adobe’s site. Sway’s embed is, in my opinion, much nicer.
For the words and images I was using I prefer Slate’s presentation a little. I like the ‘letterbox’ background images that scroll a lot. I did manage to get these working to some extent (no mobile) on my hand knitted attempt.
Medium is more focused on writing than Sway or Slate.
Medium is the only one that offers something in the way of guidance and suggestions as to what to read. I’ve enjoyed quite a lot of writing on medium through my daily email.
Both Sway and Slate are particularly nice ways to publish when you want your images to be as important as your words. Given Sway has an iPhone app it would be a good choice for using on the move (and on the bus). Sway would be a great tool for producing good looking reports from school trips. For myself I’ll probably stick to blog posts and hand knitted solutions where the fun is in the making.
_________ ________ _________ ________ ___ ___ ___ ___ |\___ ___\\ __ \|\___ ___\\ __ \|\ \ |\ \ |\ \ / /| \|___ \ \_\ \ \|\ \|___ \ \_\ \ \|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \/ / / \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ __ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \____\ \ \____ \/ / / \ \__\ \ \_______\ \ \__\ \ \__\ \__\ \_______\ \_______\__/ / / \|__| \|_______| \|__| \|__|\|__|\|_______|\|_______|\___/ / \|___|/ ________ ___ ___ ________ ___ _______ ________ ________ |\ ___ \|\ \|\ \|\ ____\|\ \ |\ ___ \ |\ __ \|\ __ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \___|\ \ \ \ \ __/|\ \ \|\ \ \ \|\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \_|/_\ \ __ \ \ _ _\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \____\ \ \____\ \ \_|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \| \ \__\\ \__\ \_______\ \_______\ \_______\ \_______\ \__\ \__\ \__\\ _\ \|__| \|__|\|_______|\|_______|\|_______|\|_______|\|__|\|__|\|__|\|__| ________ ___ ___ ___ ________ |\ ____\|\ \ |\ \|\ \|\ __ \ \ \ \___|\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \|\ /_ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ __ \ __\ \ \____\ \ \____\ \ \\\ \ \ \|\ \ |\__\ \_______\ \_______\ \_______\ \_______\ \|__|\|_______|\|_______|\|_______|\|_______|
For the last couple of commutes I’ve been hooked by a ~.
It started when I read I had a couple drinks and woke up with 1,000 nerds which touches on some many interesting things, online identity, ownership, internet history and made me think about about community, teaching about the web and some of the posts Jim Groom has be posting recently (/~space for example).
The ~tilde.club set up by Paul Ford while drinking is
not a social network it is one tiny totally standard unix computer that people respectfully use together in their shared quest to build awesome web pages
It mirrors what was the standard way to give university folk accounts and allows users to work on a remote computer through the terminal, communication and creating web pages. You will get a much better idea by reading the post and going to ~tilde.club and clicking some links.
All I’ve done so far is created a webpage, set up a blog and visited other members pages. I had a quick chat on the commandline with ~maze who answered some questions.
Hopefully I’ll use the blog to document what I am learning as I go. I am certainly learning. I’ve use a terminal now and then locally on my mac and even very occasionally to play with my Raspberry Pi, but this is quite different. I find myself strangely drawn to the process. For some of the users on the tilde clubs nostalgia is a reason for being their, I missed that whole section of computer history as I started late. Any webpage creation I’ve done has been by uploading files via FTP or by using blogging software or social media. The ~tilde clubs work in both a older and modern modern way. I’ve noticed similarities in the way the developers for glow blogs work, not ftp for them, they talk of git, and are often logged into some cloud server via a terminal.
There are other interesting features emerging on totallynuclear and other tilde clubs I hope to get the courage up to try the IRC chat soon.
What could it be good for
Apart from fun which is a good enough reason.
Given that I an a teacher I wonder if this could be a good way to teach pupils/students about the web. I don’t think that there is anything Perhaps cover some technology history and web literacy. Although the technology is not very shiny and new it does feel quite exciting. It also, to some extent, remove a veil from the technology and perhaps could loosen the ties to silos.
What does it look like?
This is a very short screencast just touching on the basics, which is all I know at the present.
Starters for 10
Some links to interesting totallynuclear things: